OC vs LA AMP Which is Better & Cheaper?

In 'Los Angeles Erotic Massage Parlors & Masseuses'

by ttkwell

Incorrect credentials.
ttkwell
12/23/2009 12:39 pm

posts: 0

Hey guys,

I just join this awesome site with tons of review of the AMP. This is a killer hobby and for the past few years, I've been with mostly escorts and now for me it's a change in scenes to AMP.

I'm curious to know which AMP's are better OC or LA ones? It seems like the LA AMP does more FS than OC but that's just my impression reading many wonderful reviews that you guys put up. I could be wrong about this but it also seems like LA FS is much cheaper? I would like to hear your thoughts on this.

TT
trojan73
12/23/2009 08:19 pm

posts: 0

Too me, the LA parlors are much beter than the ones in OC. The girls in LA offer you more better services for less money. As for the girls working in OC, they ask you for more money & offer you less favors.
apache2
12/24/2009 04:56 pm

posts: 0

So we have a "Parlor Virgin". I would have to agree with "Zorro on this one, but you also need to do some research on this site and compare the AMP's in the 2 different counties. I also found out that the "Inland Empire" is cheaper than LA or OC, but with older providers. Good thing about older providers is that there is more on the table . Bad thing is that "The grass isn't greener(literally).I live in Garden Grove so i'm south but in between LA and the IE.
ttkwell
12/29/2009 07:48 am

posts: 0

Naw, parlor virgin... perhaps in OC... When I was living in San Jose, all I went was AMP because they have redbook which is the bay area equal of here. But when I moved down to so cali, redbook's coverage of amp sucked so I mostly saw escorts and local korean apt gigs.

Just a report, my 1st OC in stanton amp happened yesterday... I guess I'm not a parlor virgin in OC! !
To reply to this topic, register for free on Adultsearch.com